Should Washington D.C. and Puerto Rico Be Admitted as US States?
Debate whether granting statehood ends disenfranchisement for 4 million American citizens or constitutes a partisan power grab to reshape the US Senate.
Pick a Side
Choose a position to defend, or let fate assign your stance.
Arguments FOR
1. Ends the outrageous taxation without representation of 700,000 Washington D.C. residents
D.C. residents pay more federal income taxes per capita than any state, fight in military wars, yet have zero voting senators or representatives.
2. Rectifies over a century of colonial territorial subjugation of 3.2 million Puerto Ricans
Puerto Ricans are natural-born US citizens who cannot vote for president and are denied equal federal Medicaid, disaster relief, and infrastructure funds.
3. D.C. has a larger population than Vermont and Wyoming, and Puerto Rico is larger than 18 states
There is zero demographic or economic justification for denying statehood to territories with populations exceeding established US states.
4. Fulfills the fundamental American democratic promise of self-determination and equal rights
Allowing millions of predominantly minority citizens to be ruled by a federal government in which they have zero voice violates democratic legitimacy.
Arguments AGAINST
1. Directly violates the founders' constitutional intent for a non-state federal capital district
Article I, Section 8 established a federal district under exclusive congressional jurisdiction specifically to prevent any single state from controlling the capital.
2. A transparent partisan power grab designed to permanently add four Democratic senators
D.C. votes over 90% Democratic; statehood is an overt scheme to pack the US Senate and alter the balance of power without broad national consensus.
3. Puerto Rico faces deep unresolved local debate between statehood, commonwealth, and independence
Local plebiscites in Puerto Rico have been marred by boycotts and low turnout, with large factions desiring full national sovereignty, not assimilation.
4. D.C. could easily achieve congressional representation by retroceding residential land to Maryland
Returning D.C.'s residential neighborhoods to Maryland (as Alexandria was returned to Virginia in 1846) grants residents full representation without creating a city-state.
Counter Questions
Questions to challenge claims and probe deeper into trade-offs.
- Why did the 23rd Amendment grant Washington D.C. electoral college votes for president while leaving it without voting representation in Congress?
- How would the US handle Puerto Rico's astronomical public debt and Spanish-language legal system upon statehood transition?
- If the residential portions of D.C. were returned to Maryland, would local residents accept it, or do they demand distinct statehood?
- Why does the US continue to maintain five inhabited colonial territories (Puerto Rico, Guam, US Virgin Islands, CNMI, American Samoa)?
- Would Republicans support statehood for Puerto Rico if political polling indicated it might elect conservative senators?
Ready to debate this topic?
Prepare your arguments and test your speech against the clock.