Should Universities Permanently Eliminate SAT and ACT Admissions Tests?
Explore whether standardized college entrance exams are irredeemably biased wealth metrics or essential checks against runaway high school grade inflation.
Pick a Side
Choose a position to defend, or let fate assign your stance.
Arguments FOR
1. Function primarily as proxies for family wealth and commercial tutoring
Scores correlate directly with household income, as affluent parents spend thousands on private test prep tutors, coaches, and multiple retakes.
2. High school grades are vastly better predictors of college success
Extensive studies across thousands of colleges prove that four-year high school GPA predicts collegiate retention and graduation far better than a four-hour test.
3. Test-free policies dramatically increase low-income and minority applicants
When universities drop testing requirements, applications from first-generation, Black, and rural students surge, expanding campus diversity.
4. Relieves immense adolescent mental health anxiety and despair
The high-stakes pressure to achieve top percentiles drives teenagers to extreme sleep deprivation, depression, and self-harm.
Arguments AGAINST
1. Essential check against widespread high school grade inflation
With over 50% of high schoolers now graduating with 'A' averages, a standardized exam provides the only objective benchmark to compare different schools.
2. Helps talented, underprivileged students prove academic brilliance
A brilliant kid from an unknown, underfunded rural high school uses a high SAT score as proof of genius to gain admission and full scholarships to MIT or Harvard.
3. Dropping tests shifts admissions to even more elitist subjective criteria
Without test scores, admissions rely on expensive extracurriculars, polo clubs, private cello lessons, and polished essays edited by paid admissions consultants.
4. Top institutions (MIT, Dartmouth, Yale) are reinstating tests based on data
Elite universities found that test-optional admissions caused underprepared students to struggle and fail out of rigorous foundational STEM courses.
Counter Questions
Questions to challenge claims and probe deeper into trade-offs.
- Why did MIT and Dartmouth reinstate mandatory testing after discovering it helped identify disadvantaged applicants they would have otherwise overlooked?
- If the SAT is eliminated, won't college admissions become a contest of who can afford the most impressive summer unpaid volunteer trips abroad?
- Could the College Board replace the SAT with a curriculum-based test (like AP exams) rather than general aptitude testing?
- Should colleges evaluate test scores strictly within the context of an applicant's high school average?
- Does grade inflation in wealthy suburban schools make it impossible for colleges to judge applicants without standardized scores?
Ready to debate this topic?
Prepare your arguments and test your speech against the clock.