Four-day workweeks, minimum wage, corporate monopolies, and labor rights. Explore all 30 motions with balanced arguments and counter-questions.
Examines whether tying CEO salary and bonuses to a multiple of rank-and-file employee earnings would reduce inequality or stifle executive talent recruitment.
Evaluates whether reducing standard workweeks to 32 hours boosts worker well-being and productivity or creates unmanageable staffing bottlenecks.
Debates whether prohibiting non-compete agreements unlocks worker wage growth and innovation or compromises trade secrets and proprietary training investments.
Analyzes European-style codetermination where employees elect board members, weighing stakeholder democracy against shareholder primacy and governance agility.
Examines whether delivery riders and rideshare drivers should receive mandatory health benefits, minimum wages, and paid leave or retain contractor flexibility.
Debates whether share repurchases represent market manipulation that enriches short-term executives or a healthy mechanism for returning surplus capital to the economy.
Evaluates whether breaking up dominant search, social media, and e-commerce platforms restores market innovation or degrades consumer integration and scale.
Debates whether keystroke logging, webcam eye-tracking, and algorithmic productivity scoring protect employer assets or violate fundamental workplace dignity.
Analyzes whether pay transparency laws close racial and gender wage gaps or create internal workplace friction and inflate recruitment costs.
Evaluates whether unpaid internships provide valuable mentorship and career entry or act as an exclusionary filter favoring wealthy families.
Debates whether private equity brings capital efficiency and modern management to healthcare or drains resources, reduces staffing, and harms patient care.
Evaluates whether legally penalizing employers for contacting staff during evenings and weekends protects mental health or undermines workplace flexibility.
Debates whether taxing robots and AI tools provides funding for displaced worker retraining or punishes productivity and technological progress.
Examines whether dynamic pricing algorithms efficiently balance supply and demand or enable predatory price gouging on groceries, transit, and necessities.
Debates whether penalizing ultra-cheap garment manufacturers stops massive textile waste in landfills or raises clothing costs for low-income families.
Evaluates FTC-style 'click-to-cancel' rules that ban dark patterns requiring phone calls, hidden menus, or retention quizzes to cancel recurring memberships.
Debates whether direct-sales MLMs offer legitimate entrepreneurial side hustles or mathematically predatory models where over 99% of participants lose money.
Evaluates whether mandatory Environmental, Social, and Governance reporting promotes sustainable capitalism or imposes politicized compliance bloat.
Analyzes EU261-style passenger rights charters that mandate cash payouts for delays, assessing whether it improves airline reliability or drives up base airfares.
Debates whether imposing personal criminal liability on executives deters corporate ecocide or unfairly punishes leaders for systemic industrial accidents.
Examines whether marketing sugary foods, toys, and games to young children is inherently predatory or a standard aspect of commercial media sponsorship.
Evaluates whether 'greedflation' by monopoly grocery conglomerates justifies price caps on staple foods or leads to severe shortages.
Debates whether replacing tips with all-inclusive pricing creates fair, reliable pay for service workers or reduces their total earning potential.
Examines whether large financial rewards successfully expose corporate crime or incentivize malicious espionage, fabricated leaks, and employee extortion.
Debates whether waiving patent protections on essential vaccines and medicines saves millions of lives or undermines global pharmaceutical R&D.
Evaluates whether mandatory worker profit-sharing reduces wealth concentration and boosts morale or hampers capital investment and hiring.
Debates whether anti-obsolescence mandates prevent millions of tons of e-waste or restrict technological hardware and software innovation.
Evaluates whether consumer drug commercials educate patients about untreated conditions or inflate medication costs and drive inappropriate prescriptions.
Debates whether capping payday loan interest stops predatory debt traps or cuts off emergency credit access for low-income unbanked borrowers.
Evaluates whether prohibiting silence clauses protects future employees from serial abusers or reduces a victim's leverage to secure generous cash settlements.